How to deal with and utilize (mathematics (education)) researchers’ beliefs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.1.2140Keywords:
researcher beliefs, background theory, methodology, domains of subjective experienceAbstract
This paper addresses the desideratum identified by Törner (2018), that researchers' beliefs are rarely addressed in the research literature dealing with beliefs. For this purpose, firstly a suitable theoretical framework is outlined that links the concept of belief with the research perspectives of researchers. Secondly, examples are given of how beliefs were, can and should be addressed in corresponding research on beliefs. Finally, it is shown in which ways explicating beliefs of mathematics education researchers might made their research, as well as their teaching more effective.
References
Altrichter, H., & Holly, M. L. (2005). Research Diaries. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 24–32). SAGE Publications.
Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher’s epistemology in mathematics education: an essay on the case of proof. ZDM, 40(3), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0103-2
Bauersfeld, H. (1983). Subjektive Erfahrungsbereiche als Grundlage einer Interaktionstheorie des Mathematiklernens und -lehrens [Domains of Subjective Experience as the Basis of an Interaction Theory of Mathematical Learning and Teaching]. In H. Bauersfeld (Ed.), Analysen zum Unterrichtshandeln: Vol. 2. Lernen und Lehren von Mathematik (pp. 1–57). Aulis-Verlag Deubner.
Bauersfeld, H. (1985). Ergebnisse und Probleme von Mikroanalysen mathematischen Unterrichts. [ Results and issues of microanalyses of mathematical teaching ]. In W. Dörfler, & R. Fischer (Eds.), Empirische Untersuchungen zum Lehren und Lernen von Mathematik, 4, 7–25.
Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2014). Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9
Bräunling, K. (2017). Beliefs von Lehrkräften zum Lehren und Lernen von Arithmetik [Teachers' beliefs about the teaching and learning of arithmetic]. Freiburger Empirische Forschung in der Mathematikdidaktik. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15093-8
Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians' mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational studies in mathematics, 79, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2
Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Psychology Press.
Dilling, F., Stoffels, G., & Witzke, I. (2024). Beliefs-oriented subject-matter didactics: Design of a seminar and a book on calculus education. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.1.2125
Eichler, A., & Erens, R. (2015). Domain-Specific Belief Systems of Secondary Mathematics Teachers. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), Advances in Mathematics Education. From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 179–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_9
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of education for teaching, 15(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102
Goldin, G. A. (2003). Affect, Meta-Affect, and Mathematical Belief Structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Mathematics Education Library. Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (Vol. 31, pp. 59–72). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_4
Goldin, G. A., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs – No Longer a Hidden Variable in Mathematical Teaching and Learning Processes. In J. Maasz & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and Attitudes in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–18). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907235_002
Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. International Student Edition. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.
Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellung gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern [Beliefs about mathematics among math teachers]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338859
Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Dialogue between Discourses: Beliefs and Identity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(3), 2–8.
Hilbert, D. (1899). Grundlagen der Geometrie [Foundations of Geometry]. BG Teubner.
Jungwirth, H. (1994). Erwachsene and Mathematik - eine reife Beziehung? [ Adults and mathematics - a mature relationship?]. Mathematica Didactica, 17(1), 69–89.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1956). Foundations of the theory of probability (2d English ed.). Chelsea Pub. Co.
Lawler, R. W. (1981). The progressive construction of mind. Cognitive Science, 5(1), 1–30.
Liljedahl, P., & Oesterle, S. (2014). Teacher Beliefs, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 583–586). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_149
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (2008). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (Rev. ed., 8 [print.]. Shambhala.
Minsky, M. (1988). Society of mind. Simon and Schuster.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Pehkonen, E. (1995). Pupils’ view of mathematics: Initial report for an international comparison project. Research report / Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki: Vol. 152. University of Helsinki.
Pehkonen, E., & Pietilä, A. (2003, February). On relationships between beliefs and knowledge in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the CERME-3 (Bellaria) meeting (pp.1–8).
Rolka, K. (2006). Eine empirische Studie über Beliefs von Lehrenden an der Schnittstelle Mathematikdidaktik und Kognitionspsychologie[An empirical study on teachers' beliefs at the interface of mathematics didactics and cognitive psychology]. PhD thesis, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM, 49, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0864-6
Steinbring, H. (2015). Mathematical interaction shaped by communication, epistemological constraints and enactivism. ZDM, 47(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0629-4
Stoffels, G. (2020). (Re-)Konstruktion von Erfahrungsbereichen bei Übergängen von empirisch-gegenständlichen zu formal-abstrakten Auffassungen [(Re-)constructing domains of experience during transitions from empirical-concrete to formal-abstract belief-systems : a theoretical foundation, historical reflections and an intervention for the transition from school to university]. universi - Universitätsverlag Siegen. https://doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/5563
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. (Keine Angabe). http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1992-97586-007
Tietze, U. P. (1990). Der Mathematiklehrer an der gymnasialen Oberstufe: Zur Erfassung berufsbezogener Kognitionen [The mathematics teacher at the upper secondary school level On the assessment of job-related cognitions]. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 11(3), 177–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340096
Törner, G. (2018). Are Researchers in Educational Theory Free of Beliefs: In Contrast to Students and Teachers? —Is There an Overseen Research Problem or Are There “Blank Spots”? In B. Rott, G. Törner, J. Peters-Dasdemir, A. Möller, & Safrudiannur (Eds.), Views and Beliefs in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01273-1_1
Witzke, I., & Spies, S. (2016). Domain-Specific Beliefs of School Calculus. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 37(S1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-016-0106-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gero Stoffels
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.