Cultivating teacher expertise: The role of pedagogical training in shaping life science university teachers’ professional vision and conceptions of teaching and learning

Neea Heinonen; Nina Katajavuori; Elina Ketonen; Mari Murtonen; Ilona Södervik

doi:10.31129/LUMAT.13.1.2875

Authors

Neea Heinonen University of Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-9590
Nina Katajavuori University of Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-2402
Elina Ketonen University of Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-2023
Mari Murtonen University of Turku, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-5731
Ilona Södervik University of Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-487X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.13.1.2875

Keywords:

Higher Education, natural science learning, mixed-methods, teachers' perceptions, teachers’ professional learning, teachers professional development

Abstract

This study investigated how life science university teachers’ professional vision, that is, their ability to notice and interpret pedagogically significant incidents in the classroom, was related to their (mis)conceptions of teaching and learning at the beginning of pedagogical training, and how these changed after the training. In addition, we examined whether distinct teacher profiles could be identified based on their conceptions of teaching and learning, and how these profiles differed in their professional vision before and after pedagogical training. A total of 127 life science university teachers from the University of Helsinki filled in a questionnaire and completed a video interpretation task. A pre-test / post-test design was used, and data were analysed quantitatively. This study shows that life science university teachers’ professional vision and conceptual understanding were related. In the pre-test, participants with fewer misconceptions tended to notice more pedagogically significant incidents compared to participants with more misconceptions. Statistically significant improvements were found in participants’ professional vision after pedagogical training. Additionally, participants’ conceptions became more scientific. In the post-test, more sophisticated conceptions of teaching and learning were related to better skills in both noticing and interpreting a classroom video. These findings suggest that life science university teachers’ professional vision may vary depending on their conceptual understanding that guides their noticing and interpreting of pedagogically relevant events in the classroom. Moreover, the cluster analysis revealed distinct teacher profiles based on their conceptions, which differed in their development of noticing skills from pre-test to post-test.

References

Barenthien, J., Fiebranz, A., Todorova, M., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2023). Development of professional vision and pedagogical content knowledge during initial teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 119, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102186

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157

Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008

Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194

Borko, H., Roberts, S. A., & Shavelson, R. (2008). Teachers’ decision making: From Alan J. Bishop to Today. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical Issues in Mathematics Education: Major Contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 37–67). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5_4

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

Burroughs, N., Gardner, J., Lee, Y., Guo, S., Touitou, I., Jansen, K., & Schmidt, W. (2019). A review of the literature on teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. In N. Burroughs, J. Gardner, Y. Lee, S. Guo, I. Touitou, K. Jansen, & W. Schmidt (Eds.), Teaching for Excellence and Equity: Analyzing Teacher Characteristics, Behaviors and Student Outcomes with TIMSS (pp. 7–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16151-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16151-4_2

Chaudhuri, S., Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2022). Teachers’ visual focus of attention in relation to students’ basic academic skills and teachers’ individual support for students: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102179

Edelsbrunner, P. A., Schalk, L., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2018). Variable control and conceptual change: A large-scale quantitative study in elementary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.003

Es, E. A. van, & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.

Eßling, I., Todorova, M., Sunder, C., Steffensky, M., & Meschede, N. (2023). The development of professional vision in pre-service teachers during initial teacher education and its relationship to beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104250

Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley.

Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20283

Goodwin, Charles. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J. (2018). Professionalizing pre-service biology teachers’ misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change. Education Sciences, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030120

Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, reimagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340

Heinonen, N., Katajavuori, N., Murtonen, M., & Södervik, I. (2023). Short pedagogical training in supporting university teachers’ professional vision: A comparison of prospective and current faculty teachers. Instructional Science, 51(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09603-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09603-7

Heinonen, N., Katajavuori, N., & Södervik, I. (2023). University teachers’ professional vision with respect to their conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from an eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1232273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1232273

Hu, L., & and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9616-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9616-7

Kember, D., & Kwan, K.-P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569608656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569608656

Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., & Krauss, S. (2016). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90–106. https://doi.org.10.1177/0022487112460398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398

König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004

Kreber, C., & Castleden, H. (2009). Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: Reflective and critically reflective processes in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields. Higher Education, 57(4), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9158-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9158-9

Lindblom‐Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680539

Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and “teaching-scholarship.” Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058082

Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471876

McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49(3), 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0

Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010

Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006

Murtonen, M., & Vilppu, H. (2020). Change in university pedagogical culture - The impact of increased pedagogical training on first teaching experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), Article 3. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.20

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. Freeman.

Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011525

Ödalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G. Ó., Schaffer, J. K., & and Fogelgren, M. (2019). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: The effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512955

Pajares, F. (1993). Preservice teachers’ beliefs: A focus for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 15(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1993.10734409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1993.10734409

Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.001

Postareff, L., & Nevgi, A. (2015). Trayectorias de desarrollo del profesorado universitario durante un curso de formación pedagógica. EDUCAR, 51(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.647

Schneider, M., & Hardy, I. (2013). Profiles of inconsistent knowledge in children’s pathways of conceptual change. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1639–1649. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030976

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098

Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modelling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321

Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009

Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27–46.

Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155

Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832714

Södervik, I., Vilppu, H., Boshuizen, H. (Els) P. A., & Murtonen, M. (2022). Development of university teachers’ professional vision of students’ prior knowledge during a short pedagogical training. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 34(1), 7–24.

Stahnke, R., & Friesen, M. (2023). The subject matters for the professional vision of classroom management: An exploratory study with biology and mathematics expert teachers. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1253459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1253459

Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.344

Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., & Holzberger, D. (2016). Intra-individual differences in developing professional vision: Preservice teachers’ changes in the course of an innovative teacher education program. Instructional Science, 44(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9373-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9373-1

Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 1(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.1.2.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.1.2.69

Vančugovienė, V., Södervik, I., Lehtinen, E., & McMullen, J. (2024). Individual differences in secondary school students’ conceptual knowledge: Latent profile analysis of biology concepts. Learning and Individual Differences, 111, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102436

Vilppu, H., Södervik, I., Postareff, L., & Murtonen, M. (2019). The effect of short online pedagogical training on university teachers’ interpretations of teaching–learning situations. Instructional Science, 47(6), 679–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09496-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09496-z

Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Wyra, M., Van Deur, P., Jeffries, D., & I Gusti Ngurah, D. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching and about the self-regulation of learning: A conceptual change perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101495

Wöhlke, C., & and Höttecke, D. (2022). Teachers’ professional vision in teaching physics – a validation study. International Journal of Science Education, 44(15), 2306–2329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2120372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2120372