Development and usability of a traditional game simulation module with augmented reality technology (AR-SiGaSTEM) in online learning to strengthen STEM skills among students

Mazlini Adnan; Laili Farhana Md Ibharim; Yoke Seng Wong; I-van Yee; Sukirman

doi:10.31129/LUMAT.12.4.2226

Authors

Mazlini Adnan Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia
Laili Farhana Md Ibharim Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-2987
Yoke Seng Wong Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia
I-van Yee Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation, Malaysia
Sukirman Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-9056

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.4.2226

Keywords:

development and usability, traditional game, simulation, augmented reality, online learning, teaching module, industry 5.0

Abstract

STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education is crucial for developing a workforce equipped for future technological demands. This study developed and evaluated the usability of an augmented reality (AR) teaching module called AR-SiGaSTEM, which applies game simulation techniques adapted from traditional games. The goal was to help teachers strengthen STEM skills among students through this innovative technology-enabled approach. The objectives were i) to identify teachers' perspectives on accepting AR-integrated teaching modules for online learning; ii) to develop an AR-SiGaSTEM module and game with content, functions and features suitable for online STEM learning; and iii) to evaluate the module's usability in teaching to enhance STEM skills across the curriculum. The study utilized design and development research methods in three phases: i) analyzing the content requirements and module design based on teachers' acceptance perspectives; ii) designing and developing the module following the ASSURE instructional model; and iii) evaluating usability with 16 STEM teachers. The AR-SiGaSTEM module targets Form One mathematics teachers. Data was collected via a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire and a usability questionnaire based on constructive alignment. The teachers agreed that well-designed, objective-aligned AR modules can effectively facilitate online learning. Usability testing showed the AR-SiGaSTEM module achieved high usability ratings. This educational technology module incorporates local wisdom through creative learning approaches aligned with the curriculum. It aims to develop science, technology, and innovation talents with knowledge/skills relevant to Industry 5.0, supporting Malaysia's National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. It exemplifies innovative pedagogical interventions to optimize creative teaching practices across STEM subjects.

References

Ab Kadir, M. Z., & Mohammad Hussain, M. A. (2023). Pembangunan Modul Kursus Asas Mekanik Struktur (KAMS) Berasaskan Teori Konstruktivisme bagi Program Teknologi Pembinaan di Kolej Vokasional. Global Journal of Educational Research and Management, 3(1), 35–44.

Abdul Bujang, S. D., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., & Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Digital learning demand for future education 4.0-case studies at Malaysia education institutions. Informatics, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013

Ahmad Saifudin, N. H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2021). Cabaran pengajaran dan pembelajaran di rumah ( PdPR ) dalam talian dengan murid sekolah rendah. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(3), 250–264.

Ajit, G., Lucas, T., & Kanyan, R. (2021). A systematic review of augmented reality in STEM education. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4280

Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900

Ateş, H., & Garzón, J. (2023). An integrated model for examining teachers’ intentions to use augmented reality in science courses. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1299–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11239-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11239-6

Chuah, K. M., Mohamad, F. S., Minoi, J. L., & Kabilan, M. K. (2021). Of Marbles and Minecraft: Designing STEM Educational Games for Culturally Diverse Young Learners in Malaysia. Proceedings of 2021 World Engineering Education Forum/Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF/GEDC). IEEE, 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WEEF/GEDC53299.2021.9657304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF/GEDC53299.2021.9657214

Cohen, J., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Dakers, J. R. (2024). What is technology education? LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.4.2207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.4.2207

Faria, A. (2024). Augmented reality and teaching strategies in the study of volcanism in elementary and secondary schools. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-024-00018-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-024-00018-5

Freese, M., Teichrew, A., Winkelmann, J., Erb, R., Ullrich, M., & Tremmel, M. (2023). Measuring teachers’ competencies for a purposeful use of augmented reality experiments in physics lessons. Frontiers in Education, 8(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1180266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1180266

Guerra, A. R., de Medeiros, L. F., & Gericota, M. (2024). A Review of Immersivity in Distance Higher Education STEM Subjects BT - Immersive Learning Research Network (M.-L. Bourguet, J. M. Krüger, D. Pedrosa, A. Dengel, A. Peña-Rios, & J. Richter (eds.); pp. 543–550). Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_39

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Rusell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. Merrill. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=2w1nQgAACAAJ

Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 123(November 2017), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education—A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198

Lee, T. T., Hamid, J., Abd Ghani, N. S. H., Syahrizal, M. A., & Bakri, Y. M. (2022). AR-CSI module and AR-CSI mobile application for molecular geometry and polarity concepts. International University Carnival on E-Learning Proceeding, 569–573.

Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

Mokmin, M. N. A., Ariffin, U. H., Muhammad, & Hamizi, M. A. A. (2022). Educators’ perspective on the use of augmented reality to create STEM learning material. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.2.14.2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.2.14.2022

Mpuangnan, K. N. (2024). Teacher preparedness and professional development needs for successful technology integration in teacher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2408837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2408837

Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 27, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1

Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Singh, C. K. S., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N. A., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034

Rocha, L. S., Krassmann, A. L., Notare, M. R., & Vidotto, K. N. S. (2024). BIM associated with virtual and augmented reality resources in an educational context: a systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2350647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2350647

Saedah, S., Muhammad Ridhuan, T. L. A., & Rozaini, M. R. (2020). Pendekatan penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan: Aplikasi kepada penyelidikan pendidikan. UPSI Press.

Schmalstieg, D., & Hollerer, T. (2016). Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice. Pearson Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0015

Setyaningsih, E., Adnan, M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Anif, S. (2021). Literature Review: Development of STEM Learning in Indonesia Based on Variation of Subjects, Media, and Strategy of Study from 2015 to 2019. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006816

Shafeey, G. A. Al, & Lakulu, M. M. (2021). Challenges Analysis for using augmented reality in education : A review. International Journal of Science and Research, 10(3), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR21306183154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR21306183154

Silmi, W. S., Ibrahim, M. M., Jamaludin, K. A., Borhan, M. T., & Rosli, M. S. (2022). Developing higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) via games: Perspective of science trainee teachers. In M. Sanmugam, N. N. Zulkifli, M. M. Ibrahim, S. Shawalludin, & I. M. Ismail (Eds.), Perspectives and Practices of Gamification (pp. 97–112). Nova Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.52305/WUPF8356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52305/WUPF8356

Vahidy, J. (2019). Enhancing STEM learning through technology. In R. Power (Ed.), Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2019 [e-book] (2nd ed.). Power Learning Solutions.

Zaharin, F. Z., Abd Karim, N. S., Adenan, N. H., Junus, N. W. M., Tarmizi, R. A., Abd Hamid, N. Z., & Abd Latib, L. (2021). Gamification in mathematics: Students’ perceptions in learning perimeter and area. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.7.2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.7.2021

Zhu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Yan, S., & Zhao, L. (2022). The selectivity and suitability of online learning resources as redictor of the effects of self-efficacy on teacher satisfaction during the COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.765832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.765832