A study on pre-service mathematics teachers’ criteria of proof evaluation

Tuğba Öztürk; Bülent Güven

doi:10.31129/LUMAT.10.1.1649

Authors

Tuğba Öztürk Trabzon University, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-8574
Bülent Güven Trabzon University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.1.1649

Keywords:

Proof, Proof evaluation, Justification, Mathematical language

Abstract

Proof is foundational to mathematics, and constructing proofs and establishing their validity are both important mathematical studies. Determining the validity of a proof is a part of the process of proof evaluation. Proof evaluation contributes to students’ ability to construct and revise their own proofs. The purpose of this study was to determine the criteria pre-service mathematics teachers take into account in evaluating a proof. The study was carried out with 50 first-year university students enrolled in an elementary mathematics teacher education program. The data were collected through activities relating to proving. The results of this study revealed that, when evaluating a proof, the participants regarded use of appropriate definitions, axioms, or theorems in the steps of the proof as the most important criterion with reference to justification, while in terms of mathematical language; they regarded appropriate use of symbolic language as the most important criterion. However, they tended to ignore situations where non-symbolic language was used. To address this issue, it is recommended that mathematics-learning environments include the use of non-symbolic language, as well as symbolic representations, in the definition of mathematical concepts.

References

Anderson J. (1996). The place of proof in school mathematics. Mathematics Teaching, 155, 33−39.

Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). Worth.

Bass, H. (2009). How do you know that you know? Making believe in mathematics. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/64280

Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof. Retrieved February 13, 2021 from http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html

Clarke, D. M., Clarke, D. J., & Sullivan, P. (2012). Reasoning in the Australian Curriculum: Understanding its meaning and using the relevant language. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(3), 28–32.

Clarke, D., Goos, M., & Morony, W. (2007). Problem solving and working mathematically: An Australian perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5-6), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0045-0

de Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17–24.

de Villiers, M. (1999). Rethinking proof with the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Key Curriculum.

Demir, E. (2017). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının muhakeme hatalarının ispatlama bağlamında incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ reasoning errors reasoning deficiencies and reasoning gaps within the context of proof] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.

Dickerson, D. S., & Doerr, H. M. (2014). High school mathematics teachers’ perspectives on the purposes of mathematical proof in school mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0091-6

Edwards, L. D. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Students’ generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711521492

Flores, A. (2002). How do children know that what they learn in mathematics is true? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(5), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.8.5.0269

Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joer, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1998). You’re going to want to find out which and prove it: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00033-4

Goetting, M. (1995). The college students’ understanding of mathematical proof (Publication No. 9539653) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465

Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21, 6–13.

Hanna, G., Bruyn, Y., Sidoli, N., & Lomas, D. (2004). Teaching proof in the context of physics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 36(3), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652775

Herbst P., & Brach C. (2006). Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: What is it that is going on for students? Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 73–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_2

Hill, H., Ball, L. D., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

Hoyles, C. (1997). The curricular shaping of students’ approaches to proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 7–16.

Imamoglu, Y., & Yontar-Togrol, A. (2012, July 8-15). An investigation of senior mathematics and teaching mathematics students’ proof evaluation practices [Conference presentation]. 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seoul, Korea. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/pdf/ICMI-12/TSG14-4-Imamoglu.pdf

Imamoglu, Y., & Yontar-Togrol, A. (2015). Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130–144.

Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358

Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12019

Knuth, E. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers' conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.

Lee, K. (2011). Students’ logical reasoning and mathematical proving of implications (Publication No. 3454803) [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Lesseig, K. (2016). Investigating mathematical knowledge for teaching proof in professional development. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 253–270.

Lesseig, K., Hine, G., Na, G. S., & Boardman, K. (2019). Perceptions on proof and the teaching of proof: A comparison across preservice secondary teachers in Australia, USA and Korea. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00260-7

Lin, F. L., Yang, K. L., & Chen, C. Y. (2004). The features and relationships of reasoning, proving, and understanding proof in number patterns. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3413-z

Manin, Yu. I. (2010). A course in mathematical logic for mathematicians (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.

Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1), 87–125.

Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI study 19 conference: Proof and proving in mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 88–93), Taipei, Taiwan.

Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Fuller, E., Weber, K., Rhoads, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9349-7

Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920410001689689

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Curriculum for secondary school mathematics (9^th, 10^th, 11^thand 12^th grades]. MEB Yayınları.

Moore, R. C. (2016). Mathematics professors’ evaluation of students’ proofs: A complex teaching practice. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 246–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0029-y

Nasibov, F., & Kaçar, A. (2005). Matematik ve matematik eğitimi hakkında [On the mathematics and mathematics education]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Kastamonu Education Journal], 13(2). 339–346.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.

Öztürk, T. (2016). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının ispatlama becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik tasarlanan öğrenme ortamının değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of the learning environment designed for improving pre-service mathematics teachers’ proving skills] (Doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Öztürk, T. (2020, Mart). Matematiğin kalbi: İspat [The heart of mathematics: Proof]. APSİSTEK. https://www.apsistek.com/index.php/mart-2020/178-matematigin-kalbi-ispat

Panse, A., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2018). Reading proofs for validation and comprehension: An expert-novice eye-movement study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4, 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0077-6

Perry, P., Molina, Ó., Camargo, L., & Samper, C. (2011, February 9-13). Analyzing the proving activity of a group of three students [Conference presentation]. The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 7), Rzeszów, Poland. http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/1/Cerme7_WG1_Perry.pdf

Pfeiffer K. (2011b, February 9-13). A schema to analyse students’ proof evaluations [Conference presentation]. The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 7), Rzeszów, Poland. http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/1/Cerme7_WG1_Pfeiffer.pdf

Pfeiffer, K. (2010). How do students evaluate and compare mathematical proofs? Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2010.496986

Pfeiffer, K. (2011a). Features and purposes of mathematical proofs in the view of novice students: observations from proof validation and evaluation performances (Publication No. U576792) [Doctoral dissertation, National University of Ireland]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Powers, R. A., Craviotto, C., & Grassl, R. M. (2010). Impact of proof validation on proof writing in abstract algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390903564603

Pulley, C. A. (2010). Using instruction to investigate the effects of assessing reasoning tasks on students’ understanding of proof (Publication No. 3438561) [Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/7.1.5

Remillard, K. S. (2009). The mathematical discourse of undergraduate mathematics majors: The relation to learning proof and establishing a learning community (Publication No. 3369995) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Segal, J. (1999). Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18(2), 191210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00028-0

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2000). Proof, validation, and trains of thought. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from https://www.maa.org/question-2-proof-validation-and-trains-of-thought

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003a). Validations of proofs written as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034698

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003b). Errors and misconceptions in college level theorem proving (Report No. 2003‐3). Cookeville, TN: Tennesse Technological University.

Selden, J., & Selden A. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274210

Senk, S. L. (1983). Proof-writing achievement and Van Hiele levels among secondary school geometry students (Publication No. T-28618) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. (2009). Modes of reasoning in explanations in Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9193-1

Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9191-3

Stylianides, A. J., Stylianides, G. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students' understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017671.47700.0b

Tabach, M., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ awareness of numerical examples as proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2010.496973

Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253–295. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0253

Varghese, T. (2011). Considerations concerning Balacheff’s 1988 taxonomy of mathematical proofs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75192

Weber K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0431

Weber, K. (2005). Problem-solving, proving, and learning: The relationship between problem solving processes and learning opportunities in the activity of proof construction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.005

Weber, K. (2009, February). Mathematics majors’ evaluation of mathematical arguments and their conception of proof [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Raleigh, North Carolina. http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2009/Weber1_LONG.pdf

Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.495468