Comparing Likert and Q
The potential of Q methodology to study pre-service teachers’ beliefs of teaching and learning of mathematics
Avainsanat:
beliefs, Likert, Q-methodology, Q-sort, pre-service teachersAbstrakti
Different methods are used to study pre-service teachers’ beliefs of teaching and learning mathematics. A common way is using Likert scale surveys to measure agreement or disagreement on items. In Q methodology, participants are asked to relate statements by ordering them in a Q-sort grid and explicate their sort. Then, the sorts of all participants are statistically analysed to detect different types of sorts (factors). In our study, N = 25 pre-service teachers filled out a Likert scale survey and then related the same items in a Q-sort. Our aim is to compare the scope of the two approaches to work out the specific insights of Q. Results from the Likert scale analyses show that pre-service teachers primarily hold constructivist views. In addition, the Q-analysis reveals typical sorts of a certain group of pre-service teachers. They can be described with respect to their subjective view based on distinguishing statements.
Tiedostolataukset
Julkaistu
Viittaaminen
Numero
Osasto
URN
Lisenssi
Copyright (c) 2024 Nils Buchholtz, Maike Vollstedt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
Tämä työ on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen Julkinen -lisenssillä.